Review |
Last Friday night, without any background, I stumbled
onto a Sacramento institution: The Doorway. It’s a dance show
that has been offered at this time of year for 6 years now by CORE
Contemporary Dance, reinvented every year by choreographer, Kelli
Leighton. As stated in its website, “CORE is a professional dance
company comprised of performance artists with diverse dance
backgrounds.” For this show, the 12-member company and its 9
“apprentices” were supplemented by a number of auditioned dancers,
bringing the cast of this year’s show to 44. (Click
here to open the program in a new window.)
The show isn’t specifically about Halloween, but it’s
a nod to that holiday, with many dark and simply surreal elements.
There’s bit of irony there because CORE stands for “Collection of Real
Experiences.” Though much of the show is indeed surreal, the range of
emotions and underlying human experiences were definitely real.
Promotional materials and the pre-show announcement
warned that we might be “creeped out” by some of what we would see. In
fact, even the pre-show experience was unnerving. Performers, singly or
in groups of 2 or 3, moved across the Harris Center stage, sat on the
edge, ventured into the audience —
mostly with severe or blank expressions. It was as if they were checking
us out to see if they approved of us. And I didn’t sense any approval.
The show began, appropriately, with a door around
which the choreography of the first scene or "room" revolved. Obviously,
the door was a symbol. I think of a door as something that opens onto
something new, perhaps something surprising and completely unexpected
— and that describes the progression of
this show. There were doors — one to
four — in nearly every scene, and it is
such continuity that holds interest and prompts speculation and thought
in the viewer. Then there was the feather-adorned hat that appeared in
every scene, usually passed from one dancer to another or snatched away.
It, too, was clearly a symbol — but of
what? Maybe a symbol of whatever you needed it to be to make sense
of the unfolding story.
The performers often looked out to the audience to
communicate, but I kept asking myself, “What does it all mean?” Maybe
the key to meaning was the emotion. And indeed, there were emotions of
all kinds. I’ve seen dances where the dancers seemed intent and focused
but emotionally neutral. Not so this performance. The dancers were
actors, and the difference began with the expressiveness of their faces.
But of course, it was primarily movement that delivered the emotional
message. The variety and creativity of the choreography from one scene
to the next — or within each scene
— was such that it seemed to me that no
move or formation, no matter how fleeting, was repeated. And yet at
that, the moves in each scene seemed to be consistent with the theme of
the scene. And for me, the whole show was a revelation of the richness
of movement of which the human body is capable.
Every scene (as I recall) included “Principal
Character,” Tina DeVine. As the pivot point for the action, I began to
imagine that the show was her dream or perhaps a symbol of the
progression of the events in her life. My struggle to grasp meaning (a
challenge thrown down by choreographer Kelli Leighton) certainly held my
attention, though it was a little like watching a foreign movie without
dubbing or subtitles.
That said, there were many scenes where the meaning
was transparent. The promise of “creeping out” was fulfilled when toward
the end of Act 1 everything turned decidedly dark, with stage fog, black
capes and eventually even gravestones as props. I may have wondered
about what was going on in other scenes, but here it was clear that
zombies were coming to get us audience members. Then there was the last
scene before intermission (“The Cattery”) that had all the performers
acting as cats (and dressed with whiskers and tails). It was relief from
the intimidation of the zombies, and especially funny when the Principal
Character suddenly had the ever-present hat attached by a string to a
6-foot pole and waved it around to tease the cats. Then there was a
return to the dark side at the beginning of the second act when
performers entered from the aisles in dark costumes, each carrying a
lantern. The subsequent scenes introduced The Gargoyles, outfitted with
truly freaky costumes and masks that covered their entire head. Their
break-dance routine was eerie and a bit intimidating. There were
impressive acrobatic moves throughout this show, but none so impressive
as the back flip off a bridge by the main gargoyle.
The Doorway was a fast-paced show. I tried to
take notes about what I was seeing, but it was frustrating because I
couldn’t begin to keep up: so much was going on. Complementing the
dancing, there was a continuous array of dazzling and surreal costumes
and props and what was, for me, completely unfamiliar electronic/punk/avant
garde music. It was all simply mesmerizing.
I certainly haven’t studied dance, nor have I seen a
great deal of it, but it seems to me that this was an exploration of the
limits of dance. It’s like the universe: the better the telescope the
farther you can see — there’s really no
end, no boundary. And there seemed to be no boundaries for the
choreography on display in The Doorway. Occasionally, I felt that
what I was watching was more of a ritual than a choreographed dance. Or
it seemed that what I was watching was a series of poses rather than a
kinetic dance. Beyond that, it was all more acrobatic than I would
expect from a dance show, and I bet that there were a lot of moves that
wouldn’t be taught in any dance studio. For example, there was a lot
going on with head movements — and with
hands and fingers. In particular, there was one repeated gesture (among
many that I may have missed seeing repeated) of curling the thumb and
forefinger to make an imaginary monocle or pair of eyeglasses. Every
movement sparked one’s imagination.
I was constantly impressed by the discipline and
perfect timing of the dancers in their unison ensemble dancing. It was
so precise that it seemed like each dancer was physically connected to
the others, or maybe that their moves were triggered by commands from
the same control panel. This was rendered all the more amazing by the
frequent frenetic pace of their routines. But then in a subsequent
scene, I would be struck by the grace, or at least artistry, of their
movements. Everything was intentional and precise. It was clear that I
was watching people who were thoroughly trained, experienced, and
dedicated to their art.
At one point, I wrote in my notes, “I don’t have the
words to describe all this.” Maybe that’s an important observation. You
can’t “get” what was displayed on that stage through a written
description. You have to experience it to appreciate it. And although I
watched for more than two hours with little understanding, the
experience was immensely satisfying, though sometimes akin to the
satisfaction that you get looking through a kaleidoscope.
Here in the Sacramento area we sometimes are
self-conscious that we’re not San Francisco or Los Angeles or New York,
assuming the most professional entertainment has to come here from those
distant places. But the show I saw would be top-quality entertainment on
any stage in any city you can name. I missed the first 5 productions of
The Doorway: I don't want to miss any more. |